The general inability to "get along"
is again at the root of the top five reasons staff members in Southern Baptist
churches are terminated from their positions, according to a recently completed
study by LifeWay’s pastoral ministries department.
Relational issues top the list for the 10th consecutive year, according to Bob
Sheffield, pastoral ministries specialist. The top five are:
1) control issues
(who’s going to run the church)
2) poor people skills
3) churches’ resistance to change
4) pastor’s leadership style being too strong
5) churches already in conflict when the pastor arrived
"The interesting
thing since we began doing this study in 1996 is that the top five have been
the top five every year," Sheffield said. "The only difference is in
their order from year to year. We consistently see the inability to develop and
maintain healthy relationships within the church as the reason for
dismissals."
The study is compiled in
cooperation with state Baptist convention church ministry relations teams and
directors of missions. Sheffield tabulates the data. Twenty-nine conventions
participated this year – the highest total in the study’s 10 years.
A total of 1,302 staff
members were dismissed in 2005: 314 bivocational, 655 full-time pastors and 333
full-time staff. The totals for full-time and staff represent the highest
totals during the 10 years, but Sheffield said the numbers could be slightly
skewed because the highest number of conventions reporting in any one year in
the past was 26 (1998, 1999 and 2003).
"The other thing to
consider is that this just represents the best data we can gather on forced
terminations," he said. "It doesn’t include those who were pressured
out."
Other reasons for
dismissals
Sheffield said that a
pastor’s administrative incompetence (No. 8) and sexual misconduct (No. 9)
cracked the top 10 for the first time and ethical misconduct (mismanaged
monies, dishonesty, etc.) makes it into the top 20 for the first time at No.
11.
"Most people would
probably think that ethical issues or sexual misconduct would have been one of
the leading reasons for dismissals," Sheffield said. "Although I am
glad they are not, I am disappointed to see sexual misconduct creeping higher
on the list, and ethical issues making the top 20. Let’s face it, this is not
an uplifting list to begin with, but I’d love to see those numbers
decline."
Another first in the top
20 is disagreement over doctrine (No. 12). "It is difficult to know
exactly what that means from the way the question is asked on the survey,"
Sheffield said, "so I won’t begin to speculate about what that means, but
it has never been this big of an issue before."
Sheffield observed that
much of the conflict that results in dismissal could be averted if pulpit
committees and pastors interacted better during the interview process.
Recognizing the current discussion taking place within the denomination
regarding pulpit committee-pastor interview process, Sheffield offered some
tips that could curb the number of dismissals.
"Pastors ought to
ask hard questions," he said. "They should ask to see the minutes
from the last several business meetings. They ought to check the [church’s]
constitution and bylaws and the annual reports to the association and state.
They should talk to area pastors about the perception of the church. They
should ask if there have been previous terminations, the tenure of the previous
three or four pastors and why they left.
Research church on the
front end
"Pastors should do
their due diligence, and as with the pulpit committee, both should be looking
for the right match." Sheffield said. "Bottom line, however, is that
if God is calling a pastor to a particularly difficult situation and he knows
that going in, he should go into it with his eyes open, understanding it might
be difficult. Obedience to God should always be the overriding factor."
Pulpit committees,
Sheffield said, ought to represent the full church but that is not always the
case.
"They often
represent the more progressive segment of the church and what it wants to see
happen, and not necessarily what the whole church wants to see happen," he
said. "Some people will say a pastor’s search committee was dishonest.
That is sometimes the case, but I believe more often the people on the committee
are communicating what they’d like to see happen and not necessarily what is
happening in a church."
Sheffield said pulpit
committees should check a pastor’s references beyond what is given and can even
ask other pastors in the community where the pastor is located for references.
Sheffield also recommended two resources available through the pastoral
ministries department to guide search committees: information at
www.lifeway.com/pastors and the Pastor’s Search Committee Handbook, Revised.